Reliable internet connections. Are they a reality in Britain yet?

Most would say no. However, the recent increase in consumer spending on reliable mobile and the domestic internet has led the development of new infrastructure, innovation, and government subsidy. The increased value of fast and affordable internet is no doubt due to the increase in cord-cutting and streaming options available to the consumer.

However, there are still issues in rural broadband areas where internet connections are limited, spotty or oversubscribed and need infrastructure investment in order to improve. The biggest issue could be the degradation and limited ability of domestic subscribers to ensure a reliable connection, many using dated routers, cables and positioning WiFi access points where there are many obstacles such as walls, corners, and doors making the signal weaker and less effective and often situated at one side of their home, rather than in the centre or where the WiFi is being used. Many new routers are combating this problem by using more antennas and user-friendly configuration wizards or combating the problem entirely by using pre-configured settings from the supplier or ISP.

Another problem may be the proximity to the exchange, as most subscribers in rural areas find their connection vastly slower compared to that of locations nearby, once again showing a performance drop that could be improved by moving away from copper to more effective methods of transmission, such as fiber.

It is however clear that the infrastructure as a whole has vastly improved and is much more capable as it was, mobile network connectivity has also improved to handle the data needs of modern apps and streaming websites as per the March report.

The issue as the report outlines is, however, meeting the demand of mobile business subscribers and providing affordable internet options to consumers. In my opinion, the use of ADSL2+ and DOCSIS 3.1 is not as much of a step in the right direction as fiber, even if it means limiting the speed available to the subscriber to segment their pricing structure.

Source, written by me in 2017.

 

Using Government to Control Multinational Corporations

Multinational Corporations have a great influence on a lot of people, this is beneficial because it provides jobs and increases GDP, trade, and economy, however it does mean that businesses have a great deal of power, which when coupled with factors like political influence, pressure groups and the media can make a company very powerful, able to control potentially thousands of jobs and staff wages.

Common Pressure Influence

Pressure groups, though not always an insider in government can have a great deal of credibility in preventing the control from multinational corporations. Pressure groups may also incorporate radical action and anti-corporation tactics, such as driving slow through London streets or protesting on a runway. However, Pressure Groups tend to focus on the ethical activities of organisations over preventing monopolies or unfair business practices, however, there are exceptions, the majority of this work is undertaken by unions.

Consumer action by boycotting products, spreading awareness on unethical factors or irresponsible activities can make a product less profitable or cause a business to re-think its stance on a particular product or practice, however, this form of activism can sometimes have no effect on the performance of a product due to its massive success or meager opposition.

Using Government to Control Multinational Corporations

The Government is arguably the most important factor in controlling MNC’s, from maintaining fair work arrangements, breaks, pay and holiday to preventing global price fixing and implementing transnational tariffs to protect local business and economy, the government to some companies could be seen as enemy number one. It is necessary to control MNC’s to manage their growth and influence in a country. Similarly a multinational may move abroad to save money on things like manufacture, however, this is bad for local jobs, it may increase profitability for an MNC. For this reason, it is sometimes probable that a government may subsidise the company to prevent it moving abroad.

governmentvsmncs

However some massive MNC companies have profits each year greater than entire country GDP’s, this could be seen as a failure of the government to control its businesses. Finally, although MNCs need control they do provide massive benefits to a country in trade, prosperity and GDP that make them worthwhile today.